🔗 Share this article

A surprising connection on LinkedIn. An offer of work from a headhunter, most likely a young woman, based in China. The opportunity to earn perhaps £20,000 part-time writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a firm from China peppered with “non-public” or privileged information. Payment in cryptocurrency or physical money favored.

It may seem clear, on this telling, that an element about this approach would be amiss. However, Beijing's powerful intelligence agency still considers it worthwhile to deploy recruitment consultants to attempt this – leading MI5 to warn repeatedly about their operations online.

Massive Contact Attempts on Professional Networks

Last year, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum said Chinese agents were contacting UK citizens on LinkedIn on an unprecedented scale, at a frequency of ten thousand over the previous 30-month period, attempting to obtain political, industrial, defense and technological secrets. But a fresh campaign aimed at politicians and parliament has prompted the spy agency to take further action.

A spying warning was distributed on this week via the administrative teams of Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords equivalent: a single slide after the persistent attempts of certain individuals and Amanda Qiu to reach out to Members of Parliament, lords, their staffers, economists, thinktanks – anybody who might become a source.

Security Approach and Legislative Changes

In the typical manner of British intelligence, there was no publication of the security advice from MI5 or the interior ministry. But the agency was aware its briefing note would become public once it was emailed out to Westminster. Sharing it in the press helps the general population more easily recognize interactions with a deceptive intent.

The alert has the impact of flushing out additional details from within parliament, although that is not the agency's main objective. The service aims for public figures to recognize that just because interactions on professional networks are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it doesn't imply they are completely safe.

Nor is internal security service understood to have been reacting to a particular event in parliament, although the burst of activity does come after the embarrassing collapse of the prosecution of a former parliamentary aide an individual and his associate Christopher Berry on a technicality earlier in the autumn.

The two had been charged of working for the foreign power – a charge they denied – but inability to complete a trial under the since replaced Official Secrets Act led to warnings that British democracy had been insufficiently defended.

Updated Laws and China's Strategic Interests

Legislation has since been updated, and the security briefing contains a reminder of its replacement: “Individuals involved in espionage activity risk significant legal consequences under the new security law.” It is a criminal offense if somebody engages in conduct that is or is likely to “significantly help a foreign intelligence service”.

An obvious inquiry, though, is what Beijing has to gain. A politician who is outside ministerial roles will have restricted knowledge of sensitive information, and an contact of theirs even less. But Beijing is also interested in the legislative body: for a time, in 2020 and 2021, the Britain's approach to China on matters such as Huawei or the human rights situation or alleged atrocities was being influenced by parliamentarians.

Methodological Differences and Persistent Cyber Risks

In part there are distinct approaches too. Authoritarian governments like China’s export intelligence collection methods and the scale of its spy network is vast, employing three hundred thousand people. Chris Inglis, a American cybersecurity head under the US administration, said it was sometimes estimated that “the Chinese have greater linguistic capacity involved in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is willing to develop contacts over the extended period and sometimes even the intelligence services have found it difficult to distinguish between legitimate relationships and espionage. “China has a low threshold for which details is considered to be useful,” security minister a government official told parliamentarians on Wednesday, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may result in someone rapidly marginal becomes important.

An alternative perspective to consider the relentless efforts at secret intelligence collection is in the wider context of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the west at a level under the level of outright war. The nation has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of phone and data networks in 80 countries, and the Volt Typhoon compromise of millions internet devices.

Chinese authorities is engaged in relentless efforts to identify covert sources on British democracy online because it wants to be provocative, to display power and because it has the capability.