🔗 Share this article

Ten years after the UK entered into a hurried public vote that split the nation and triggered disorder, a advisory is issued from across the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Policymakers and citizens sleepwalked into Brexit and the identical may happen with a referendum on a united Ireland, initiating disturbances for which nobody is ready.

That represents the warning from two prominent journalists from each side of the Irish border who have joined forces to scrutinise the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to establish a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Structures Unprepared

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have determined that the administrative systems in Ireland and Britain are woefully unready for a possibly fraught and seismic public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that developments can emerge unexpectedly and can gain traction rapidly," O’Toole stated. "I would suggest that the institutional structure of our region remains extremely volatile."

Book Publication Seeks to Stir Debate

The pair have analysed the political, economic and societal rationales for any governmental shift in a publication, For and Against a United Ireland, issued by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to provoke discussion on the topic with a tour of public talks that will bring them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What troubles all parties, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," commented the analyst.

"We must avoid a referendum on a yes-no, vague proposition whose consequences have not been spelled out because then you end up with an highly split population where those defeated are not reconciled to losing and the victorious side lack clarity precisely what it is that they have gained."

Legal Framework

Under the peace accord, the Northern Ireland government minister is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unity if it seems probable that a majority would support.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups argue that moment is looming, and a group named Ireland’s Future has built momentum, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists minimise the likelihood, leaving it unclear whether or when there could be a national vote.

Lack of Substantive Discussion

Partisan language for and against unity has obscured the shortage of informed dialogue, noted the journalist.

"Many are for or against the concept but the detailed consideration which may surpass that to realise it is mostly absent. Much has gone on in scholarly circles but hardly any politicians or advocates are willing to participate with even the basics. As an example, what sort of state would you want? Centralised? Federal?"

Volume's Strategy

In the book, neither author supports unity or the status quo. Each writes two articles that strive for neutrality in laying out the rationale for a united Ireland and the case against, gathering economic and social figures, previous instances and constitutional models.

Arguments range over flags and symbols, levies, health services, elderly benefits, national debt responsibilities and the danger of loyalist violence. The goal is to enlighten and provoke discussion.

"Considerable attention exists in the issue but there is still lacking a dialogue," commented the writer. "Debate suggests an acknowledgement of the idea that there may exist good arguments on either side."

Simultaneous Plebiscites

A referendum in Northern Ireland would simultaneously prompt one in the republic, where voters report they favour unity but reject increased taxation or introducing a new flag to recognise pro-UK communities' British culture.

"Authorities in Dublin does need to work out what the offer from Irish nationalism is other than just stating: 'We seek a unified Ireland and we love you'," said O’Toole.

Likelihood of Public Vote

The journalist believes a national vote in his generation is probable and that it could happen suddenly. "You could have just a irresponsible or a bad or a incompetent government minister who says: 'Let's just do this and resolve it.'"

Each of the nationalists and unionists have reasonable, valid arguments, he said. "One side will succeed in this matter and somebody will in the end be defeated but each side has possesses important lessons to gain from the alternative positions."

Request for Broader Debate

Westminster should engage with the discussion, said the analyst. "This is about your state. It's a UK matter just as much as it is an Irish question."